critical

CVE-2025-67895

Apache Airflow Providers Edge3 exposes internal API allowing RCE in web server context

Published 17 Dec 2025Modified 17 Jun 2026CWE 669

In the Trivy database since at least 24 Oct 2026, 07:11 UTCWhen it arrived before that build is not recorded.

Severity by source

GHSA9.8CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Trivy's own label is CRITICAL. Rated critical by GHSA.

Description

Edge3 Worker RPC RCE on Airflow 2. This issue affects Apache Airflow Providers Edge3: before 2.0.0 - and only if you installed and configured it on Airflow 2. The Edge3 provider support in Airflow 2 has been always development-only and not officially released, however if you installed and configured Edge3 provider in Airflow 2, it implicitly enabled non-public (normally) API which was used to test Edge Provider in Airflow 2 during the development. This API allowed Dag author to perform Remote Code Execution in the webserver context, which Dag Author was not supposed to be able to do. If you installed and configured Edge3 provider for Airflow 2, you should uninstall it and migrate to Airflow 3. The new Edge3 provider versions (>=2.0.0) has minimum version of Airflow set to 3 and the RCE-prone Airflow 2 code is removed, so it should no longer be possible to use the Edge3 provider 2.0.0+ on Airflow 2. If you used Edge Provider in Airflow 3, you are not affected.

Affected packages and fixed versions

Source	Package	Fixed in
pip::GitHub Security Advisory pip	apache-airflow-providers-edge3	2.0.0

References

What Attestkeep does with this

Inside your cluster, without you opening a spreadsheet.

KnowsThe scanner refreshes its vulnerability database every six hours.

FindsEvery admitted image is rescanned every 24 hours by default (scan.rescanInterval). When Trivy rates this vulnerability critical for the image's package source, it appears in the image's findings by name. Findings without a fix are left out unless includeUnfixed is on.

Tells youA critical_finding event goes to the channels subscribed to it: e-mail, Slack, Teams, a webhook, Jira, GitLab or GitHub.

RefusesWith a policy that blocks critical findings, a pod with this image is refused at admission, a rollback to it included. Pods already running are not evicted.

RecordsEach decision is recorded with the policy that ran and its hash, then sealed under a signed checkpoint.

Try Attestkeep

Read the docs