Vulnérabilités / CVE-2026-41583

critique

CVE-2026-41583

Zebra Vulnerable to Consensus Divergence in Transparent Sighash Hash-Type Handling

Publiée Modifiée CWE 573
Dans la Trivy database depuis au moins le 24 oct. 2026, 07:11 UTCLa date d'entrée avant ce build n'est pas enregistrée.

Sévérité par source

NVD9.1CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
GHSA9.3CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H

Le label propre à Trivy est CRITICAL. Critique selon NVD, GHSA.

Description

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.1 and prior to zebra-script version 5.0.2, after a refactoring, Zebra failed to validate a consensus rule that restricted the possible values of sighash hash types for V5 transactions which were enabled in the NU5 network upgrade. Zebra nodes could thus accept and eventually mine a block that would be considered invalid by zcashd nodes, creating a consensus split between Zebra and zcashd nodes. In a similar vein, for V4 transactions, Zebra mistakenly used the "canonical" hash type when computing the sighash while zcashd (correctly per the spec) uses the raw value, which could also crate a consensus split. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.1 and zebra-script version 5.0.2.

Paquets affectés et versions corrigées

SourcePaquetCorrigé en
cargo::GitHub Security Advisory Rustzebra-script, zebrad5.0.2 et 1 autres
Afficher les 2 entrées d'une source
SourcePaquetCorrigé en
cargo::GitHub Security Advisory Rustzebra-script5.0.2
cargo::GitHub Security Advisory Rustzebrad4.3.1

Références

Vulnerability data compiled from the Trivy vulnerability database (trivy-db, Aqua Security, Apache License 2.0), which aggregates third-party advisories. CVE records are published by The MITRE Corporation under the CVE Terms of Use; CVE is a trademark of MITRE. This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Severity, titles and advisory data from the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0), Red Hat security data (CC BY 4.0) and the other sources linked on each entry. Entries may be summarised or re-formatted; the linked original is the authoritative record.